Case Study

Restoring Control Over Enterprise Technology Spend by 27%

Executive Summary

  • Audit-led engagement validating enterprise-wide technology spend
  • 27% reduction identified and realized across voice, mobility, SaaS, and infrastructure
  • Findings supported by invoice- and contract-level evidence
  • Savings validated only after appearing on vendor invoices
  • Engagement established a durable baseline for ongoing cost control


The Challenge

The organization managed a complex enterprise technology environment spanning communications, applications, and network infrastructure. Over time, office expansions, vendor changes, SaaS adoption, and contract renewals created fragmented ownership across Finance, IT, and Operations. While overall technology spend was visible at a high level, leadership lacked confidence in:

  • Accuracy of service inventories
  • Billing compliance across multiple vendors
  • Enforcement of contract terms and entitlements

Previous efforts focused on isolated cost reviews or vendor negotiations. While these initiatives produced short-term results, they failed to address underlying inventory accuracy, billing validation, and contract enforcement issues. As a result, savings eroded and discrepancies reappeared. The organization needed a defensible, enterprise-wide audit to establish a reliable baseline and reduce costs without disrupting operations. 

The DBC Approach

Dev-Byrne & Company conducted an audit-informed review across the organization’s full technology portfolio. The engagement included: 

  • Validation of billed services against active inventory across voice, mobility, SaaS, and infrastructure
  • Review of vendor contracts, pricing structures, and applied discounts
  • Identification of unused, duplicate, and legacy services across technology domains
  • Historical billing analysis to confirm compliance and recovery eligibility
 

All findings were supported by invoice and contract-level evidence and reviewed with Finance and IT stakeholders. Recommendations were prioritized based on financial impact and execution risk, ensuring corrective actions could be implemented without operational disruption.

The Outcome

  • 27% reduction in enterprise technology spend identified and validated
  • Material annual savings across voice, mobility, SaaS, and infrastructure services
  • Sustained monthly cost reductions confirmed through invoice review
  • Improved visibility into technology inventory, billing accuracy, and contract compliance
  • Clear separation between identified, approved, and realized savings
 

Savings were only counted after appearing on vendor invoices, reinforcing confidence in reported results.

What Changed

Beyond cost reduction, the organization gained a more disciplined operating baseline for managing technology expenses. Inventory accuracy improved across multiple domains, billing validation became repeatable, and execution ownership was clarified between Finance and IT. This reduced recurring discrepancies and lowered the effort required to maintain ongoing cost control.

Why it Worked

  • Audit-informed methodology applied across the full technology portfolio
  • Vendor-neutral execution focused on accuracy and defensibility
  • Disciplined validation that prevented regression
  • Executive-ready documentation supporting governance and confidence
 

The organization moved from fragmented reviews to a unified, defensible approach to managing enterprise technology spend.

Client Snapshot

Industry: Enterprise

Organization Type: Multi-location corporate 

Footprint: Headquarters with multiple regional offices

Technology Environment: Voice, Mobility, SaaS applications, Infrastructure services

Engagement Type: Technology Expense Audit

 

Recent Case Studies

Considering Your Approach

Organizations managing complex technology environments often benefit from a disciplined review of inventory accuracy, contract alignment, execution ownership, and sourcing decisions. A structured discussion can help determine whether audit, consulting, or sourcing support is appropriate for your environment. 

start a conversation

results

Case studies

engage

let's talk