Case Study

Selecting an Enterprise Ticketing Platform Built for Healthcare Scale

Executive Summary

  • Sourcing-led engagement selecting an enterprise ITSM platform for healthcare-scale operations
  • Discovery-first process aligned requirements to real workflows across clinical and non-clinical teams
  • Vendors evaluated on scalability, governance, and execution readiness, not features alone
  • Decision documentation aligned IT, Operations, and Finance stakeholders
  • Engagement reduced adoption risk and ensured long-term scalability


The Challenge

The healthcare organization operated a ticketing environment that no longer supported its scale, complexity, or operational requirements. As the organization grew, service requests spanned multiple departments with distinct workflows, compliance obligations, and response-time expectations. Leadership recognized that the challenge was not simply replacing a tool. Selecting the wrong platform would introduce operational risk, slow adoption, and create downstream inefficiencies across both clinical and non-clinical teams.

Previous evaluations focused too heavily on features and licensing costs without adequately assessing scalability, fit across diverse operational groups, implementation complexity and timeline risk, or long-term administrative and reporting burden. The organization needed a disciplined, enterprise-grade sourcing process to ensure the selected platform aligned with healthcare workflows and long-term growth plans.

The DBC Sourcing Approach

Dev-Byrne & Company led a discovery-first, governance-driven sourcing engagement to support a high-impact platform decision. Rather than beginning with vendor demonstrations, DBC structured the process around requirements definition, risk assessment, and execution readiness.

Requirements Discovery and Alignment

DBC worked with stakeholders across IT, Operations, and Finance to define detailed requirements, including:

  • Ticket volume, routing complexity, and prioritization logic
  • Department-specific workflows and approval structures
  • Reporting, auditability, and compliance requirements
  • Integration needs with existing enterprise systems
  • Administrative overhead and long-term support models
 

This ensured the sourcing process reflected how the organization actually operated, not how vendors marketed their platforms.

RFP Design and Vendor Evaluation

DBC designed and managed a formal RFP process to evaluate enterprise-grade ticketing platforms.

The evaluation framework assessed:

  • Platform scalability and architectural fit
  • Licensing models and long-term cost implications
  • Implementation effort and timeline risk
  • Usability across technical and non-technical user groups
  • Governance, reporting, and audit readiness
 

Each vendor was evaluated consistently against defined criteria, allowing stakeholders to compare solutions based on operational fit rather than sales narratives.

Execution and Adoption Readiness

Throughout the sourcing process, DBC evaluated downstream execution considerations, including:

  • Change management and user adoption risk
  • Configuration and rollout sequencing
  • Administrative ownership following implementation
  • Long-term flexibility as the organization scaled
 

This prevented selection of a platform that would require costly rework or premature replacement.

The Outcome

 Selection of an enterprise-grade ticketing platform aligned to healthcare operations

  • Reduced risk of failed adoption or implementation delays
  • Clear documentation of decision rationale and tradeoffs
  • Improved alignment between IT, Operations, and Finance stakeholders
  • Increased confidence that the platform would scale with organizational growth
 

While commercial terms were evaluated, the primary value delivered was selecting a solution that could be implemented successfully and supported long term.

What Changed

Ticketing platform selection shifted from a transactional procurement exercise to a strategic decision supported by governance and discipline. Stakeholders aligned earlier, execution risks were surfaced before contracts were signed, and the organization avoided selecting a platform based solely on features or price.

Why It Worked

 Discovery-first, audit-informed sourcing methodology

  • Enterprise-grade RFP design and evaluation
  • Healthcare-specific workflow and governance alignment
  • Execution-aware decision-making that reduced downstream risk
 

DBC ensured the platform decision supported both operational performance and long-term scalability.

Client Snapshot

Industry: Healthcare

Organization Type: Multi-site healthcare organization

User Base: 4,700+ end users

Operational Scope: IT Operations, HRIS, Radiology, Security, Engineering, Finance, AP Clinical Support

Engagement Type: Technology Sourcing (Enterprise ITSM / Ticketing Platform)

Recent Case Studies

Considering Your Approach

Organizations managing complex technology environments often benefit from a disciplined review of inventory accuracy, contract alignment, execution ownership, and sourcing decisions. A structured discussion can help determine whether audit, consulting, or sourcing support is appropriate for your environment. 

start a conversation

results

Case studies

engage

let's talk